Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 49 WASHAPP 859 - State v. Pockert

State v. Pockert’s Empirical Analysis

1987

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
2
states following
January 2001
most recently cited

6 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Cree v. Goldstein · United States v. S.A. Empresa de Viacao Aerea Rio Grandense · United States v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours & Co. · State v. Avcollie · State v. Linder

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “When a verdict or a special finding is returned and before it is recorded, the jury shall be polled at the request of any party or upon the court's own motion. If at the conclusion of the poll, all of the jurors do not concur, the jury may be directed to retire for further deliberations or may be discharged by the court.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.