Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 49 Wis. 2d 537 - McKissick v. State

49 Wis. 2d 537 - McKissick v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1971

Citation profile

46
cited by 46 later decisions
1
states following
July 1999
most recently cited

44 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 46 later decisions — most recently July 1999 · most notably 80 Wis. 2d 122 - State v. Mendoza (1977), 50 Wis. 2d 408 - State v. Hebard (1971)

44 state decisions

380197119801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Irvin v. Dowd · Swain v. State of Alabama · Brown v. Allen · Hernandez v. Texas · Whitus v. State of Georgia Whitus

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 46 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““[1] the inflammatory nature of the publicity concerning the crime; [2] the degree to which adverse publicity permeated the area from which the jury panel would be drawn; [3] the timing and specificity of the publicity; [4] the degree of care exercised; [5] the amount of difficulty encountered in selecting the jury; [6] the extent to which jurors were familiar with the publicity; [7] the defendant’s utilization of challenges, both peremptory and for cause, available to him on voir dire; [8] the participation of the state in the adverse publicity; and [9] the severity of the offense charged and the nature of the verdict returned.” (Pp. 426, 427)”
    9 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “. . The mere lack of proportional representation of races on a jury panel does not constitute discrimination, and an accused is ‘not constitutionally entitled to demand a proportionate number of his race on the jury which tries him nor on the venire or jury roll from which petit jurors are drawn. . . .’ ””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.