Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 49 WVA 446 - Fluharty v. Mills

Fluharty v. Mills’s Empirical Analysis

1901

Citation profile

11
cited by 11 later decisions
2
states following
June 1960
most recently cited

11 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently June 1960

11 state decisions

401901191019201930194019501960decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Stuart v. Pennis · 20 W. Va. 175 - Cox v. Douglass · Hinchman v. Ballard · Gallaher v. City of Moundsville · Watson v. Ferrell

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““It is proper to say that though an oral agreement is not enforceable by action at law or suit in equity, but until executed is revocable by the parties at will, yet it is a license to enter upon the land and take the timber, and exempts the party from an action of trespass, and the moment -the tree is severed from the soil it ceases to be realty, is converted into a chattel, and belongs to the purchaser.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.