Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 490 BR 146 - In re Vierstra

In re Vierstra’s Empirical Analysis

2013

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
May 2017
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 1 district ·

Relationships

Applies 11 U.S.C. § 101 (Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005) · 11 U.S.C. § 522 · 11 U.S.C. § 541

Relies on Taylor v. Freeland & Kronz · Mercer v. Monzack · Newman v. White (In Re Newman) · In re Gordon · Gordon v. Pappalardo (In re Gordon)

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[P]ursuant to § 522(b)(1), a Massachusetts debtor may exempt interests in certain property from the bankruptcy estate by electing either the exemption scheme set forth in § 522(b)(2) (those listed in § 522(d)) or § 522(b)(3) (the”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.