Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 490 F.2d 1321 - United States v. Majors

United States v. Majors’s Empirical Analysis

490 F.2d 1321 · 1974

Citation profile

29
cited by 29 later decisions
8
states following
July 2011
most recently cited

9 federal appellate · 1 district · 17 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 29 later decisions — most recently July 2011 · most notably United States v. Scroggins (1989), State v. Downs (1977)

9 federal appellate · 1 district · 17 state decisions

13019741980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2311 (Anti Car Theft Act of 1992) · 18 U.S.C. § 751 · 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Relies on Gideon v. Wainwright · Williams v. People of State of New York · United States v. Tucker · Burgett v. Texas · Eisenstadt v. Baker

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 29 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[T]he sentencing judge is entitled to all the help he [or she] can get.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “. . The dismissed indictment and the charge contained in it are within the kind of information which a court may properly consider in passing sentence. The plea bargain and the indictment dismissal resulting from it did not and, indeed, could not, deprive the judge of the right and probably the duty of giving consideration to it. . . .””
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.