Daigle v. Warner’s Empirical Analysis
490 F.2d 358 · 1973
Citation profile
13 federal appellate · 1 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 19 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently November 2007
13 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Johnson v. Zerbst · Gideon v. Wainwright · United States v. Wade · Escobedo v. Illinois
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““. . . civil labels and good intentions do not themselves obviate the need for criminal due process safeguards in juvenile courts, for ‘[a] proceeding where the issue is whether the child will be found to be “delinquent” and subjected to the loss of his liberty for years is comparable in seriousness to a felony prosecution’.” (emphasis added).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Andrews v. Knowlton“a timely and colorable claim (1) that he has a defense, or (2) that there are mitigating circumstances, and the assistance of counsel is necessary in order adequately to present the defense or mitigating circumstances.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Middendorf v. Henry“(w)hile the Navy argues with some vigor that naval discipline will suffer severely if appointed counsel are required (in summary courts-martial), there is scant support for this in the record.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Middendorf v. Henry
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.