Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 490 F.2d 626 - Todd v. Lockhart

Todd v. Lockhart’s Empirical Analysis

490 F.2d 626 · 1974

Citation profile

76
cited by 76 later decisions
17
states following
June 2014
most recently cited

33 federal appellate · 2 district · 27 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 76 later decisions — most recently June 2014 · most notably State v. Ballard (1981), Fruchtman v. Kenton (1976)

33 federal appellate · 2 district · 27 state decisions — followed in 17 states

36019741980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Boykin v. Alabama · McCarthy v. United States · Hardin v. United States · Riddell v. Rhay, Penitentiary Superintendent · State v. Darling

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 76 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““. . . [W]e hold that once a state prisoner has demonstrated that the plea taking was not conducted in accordance with Boykin, the state may, if it affirmatively proves in a post-conviction hearing that the plea was voluntary and intelligent, obviate the necessity of vacating the plea.””
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““We note that Boykin enumerated three constitutional rights which are waived by a plea of guilty, and those rights are: the right to a jury trial, the right to confront one’s accusers, and the privilege against self-incrimination. But we agree that Boykin does not require the express articulation and waiver of these three rights at the time the plea is entered.” Todd v. Lockhart, 490 F.2d at 628 fn. 1.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.