Quiocson v. Office of Personnel Management’s Empirical Analysis
490 F.3d 1358 · 2007
Citation profile
3 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 5 U.S.C. § 8331 (Capitol Police Retirement Act) · 5 U.S.C. § 8333 · 5 U.S.C. § 8347
Relies on Rosete v. Office of Personnel Management · Brice v. Cisneros · Guzman v. Department of the Navy · Spectra-Physics Inc v. Symbol Technologies Inc
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 32 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Mr. Quiocson's appointment forms indicate that his positions were not covered by the CSRS and that no CSRS retirement contributions were withheld from his pay. Mr. Quiocson was covered by a different retirement system, the FEPI. His receipt of benefits under a non-CSRS plan indicates that his service was not covered under the CSRS.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.