United States v. Davis’s Empirical Analysis
490 F.3d 541 · 2007
Citation profile
16 federal appellate · 1 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 36 later decisions — most recently February 2021 · most notably United States v. Washington (2013), United States v. Hunt (2008)
16 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1347 (§ 242 of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996) · 18 U.S.C. § 1518 (§ 245 of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996)
Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · Tibbs v. Florida · United States v. August · Polec v. Northwest Airlines, Inc. · United States v. Straughter
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 36 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“knowingly and willfully executes, or attempts to execute, a scheme or artifice— (1) to defraud any health care benefit program; or (2) to obtain, by means of false or fraudulent pretenses, representations, or promises, any of the money ... owned by ... any health care benefit program, in connection with the delivery of or payment for health care benefits, items or services.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.