Gillmor v. Thomas’s Empirical Analysis
490 F.3d 791 · 2007
Citation profile
8 federal appellate · 3 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently October 2024
8 federal appellate · 3 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Bell v. Hood · Sedima Sprl v. Imrex Company Inc · Nollan v. California Coastal Commission · Dolan v. City of Tigard · Evans v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“In order to bring a RICO claim, a plaintiff must allege a violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1962 , which consists of four elements: “(1) conduct (2) of an enterprise (3) through a pattern (4) of racketeering activity.” (Citation omitted.)”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.