Magar v. Parker’s Empirical Analysis
490 F.3d 816 · 2007
Citation profile
8 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 47 later decisions — most recently July 2023 · most notably Fairchild v. Workman (2009), Gardner v. Galetka (2009)
8 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 28 U.S.C. § 2253 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Slack v. McDaniel · Coleman v. Thompson · Woodford v. Ngo · Gray v. Netherland · Lorenzo Montez v. Mark McKinna
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 47 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“cause for the default and actual prejudice”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Smith v. Allbaugh
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.