¶1 Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
¶2 Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
¶3 Billy G. Asemani appeals the district court’s order construing his self-styled application for habeas relief as a petition for writ of mandamus and dismissing it without prejudice for lack of jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Asemani v. Bishop, No. 1:12-cv-02075-RDB (D.Md. July 19, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and ar *608 gument would not aid the decisional process.
¶4 AFFIRMED.