490 F. Supp. 2d 72 - Godette v. Stanley’s Empirical Analysis
2007
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 6 district ·
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act)) · 42 U.S.C. § 1985
Relies on Illinois v. Gates · Schneckloth v. Bustamonte · Graham v. Connor · United States v. Mendenhall · City of Los Angeles v. Heller
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Subject to Uniform Rules for Collection (1995 Version) International Chamber of Commerce, Publication No. 522.” The URC, however, does not have the force of law, but is binding only on those institutions that voluntarily agree to adhere to its provisions. Its terms therefore cannot bind plaintiff, who is not a party to any agreement concerning the URC. 20 . The scope of physical harm required to sustain a negligent infliction claim has”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“While expert medical testimony might be needed to make this [objective evidence of harm] showing, it is not mandatory”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.