Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 490 NW2D 798 - State v. Miles

State v. Miles’s Empirical Analysis

1992

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
September 2011
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 5 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Jones v. State · State v. Allen · State v. Overstreet · State v. Jones · Mays v. C. Mac Chambers Co., Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “This broad discretion is particularly appropriate. It is important to distinguish between the unavoidable, legitimate claims and those proposed in desperation by a disappointed litigant. From its closer vantage point, the presiding trial court has a clearer view of this crucial question, and we generally yield to its determination.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.