Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 490 P2D 752 - Hardt v. State

Hardt v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1971

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
November 1980
most recently cited

5 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Jones v. State · Sandefur v. State · Christian v. United States · 83 Okla. Crim. 263 - Dawson v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““. . . The Federal Statutes authorize trial courts to appoint an investigator where such services are necessary, wherein under the statutes of the State of Oklahoma, there is no provision for such appointments. Until our Legislature sees fit to enact legislation providing for such appointments, the trial courts are without authority to comply with such requests.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.