Loane v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1971
Citation profile
5
cited by 5 later decisions
3
states following
April 1984
most recently cited
5 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Williams v. Illinois · Libby, McNeill & Libby v. Alaska Industrial Board · Dipson Theatres, Inc. v. Buffalo Theatres, Inc. · 11 Okla. Crim. 103 - Estep v. State · Lawson v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““We are of the opinion that the two sales were not, in fact, a continuing transaction, and as such constitutes two distinct offenses. We observe the differences in the time of the sales, the differences in the amounts of each sale, the differences in the number of items sold on each occasion, and the obvious completeness of each sale, that is the exchange of money, and the passing possession of the drugs.””
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.