Royal v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1971
Citation profile
1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 56 Okla. Crim. 413 - Lucas v. State · 34 Okla. Crim. 359 - Williams v. State · 44 Okla. Crim. 425 - Bruner v. State · 41 Okla. Crim. 87 - Ex Parte Dilbeck · 68 Okla. Crim. 431 - James v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“This Court has repeatedly held that as the recitations of the Affidavit and of the Search Warrant were with reference to the offense charged, admission of the Affidavit and Search Warrant as independent evidence was prejudicial error.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Brumfield v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.