v. Tallent’s Empirical Analysis
2020
Citation profile
1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
September 2021
most recently cited
1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Burks v. United States · Hagos v. People · People v. Roybal · Moody v. People
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“First, applying the factors listed above, the court must exercise its discretion to determine whether it will allow the prosecution to advance new arguments on remand. If the court determines that new arguments against suppression are proper on remand, it may proceed to the second step by ruling on the substance of the new arguments.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence“) . The division concluded that " [b] ecause Tallent was arrested without probable cause, evidence obtained as a result of that arrest should not have been admitted at trial.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“the party proposing a new argument [is] at fault for having failed to preserve it in an earlier proceeding,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.