Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 490 So. 2d 193 - Everett v. Carter

490 So. 2d 193 - Everett v. Carter’s Empirical Analysis

1986

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
2
states following
September 2021
most recently cited

4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently September 2021

4 state decisions

2019861990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 922 (Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act)

Relies on 479 So. 2d 114 - METROPOLITAN PROPERTY v. Chicago Ins. Co. · 438 So. 2d 14 - Stahl v. Metropolitan Dade County · 360 So. 2d 406 - Stuart v. State · Ward v. University of the South · 372 So. 2d 1074 - Robinson v. Howard Bros. of Jackson, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “criminal act ... was an independent intervening cause that was not within the realm of reasonable foreseeability on the part of [Shop & Go].”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “`[t]here is normally much less reason to anticipate acts on the part of others which are malicious and intentionally damaging than those which are merely negligent; and this is all the more true where, as is usually the case, such acts are criminal.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “an anomaly in the law in the State of Florida with respect to the sale and possession of firearms other than rifles and shotguns as a result of the irreconcilable provisions of Florida and federal law.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.