Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 490 So. 2d 198 - Sanchez v. State

490 So. 2d 198 - Sanchez v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1986

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
2
states following
May 2019
most recently cited

6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently May 2019

6 state decisions

401986199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Burgess v. State · State v. Hill · Dixon v. State · Griffin v. State · Masters v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[E]ven if the issue were properly preserved, a review of the record clearly demonstrates that the jury intended to find Sanchez guilty of the greater offense. The evidence unquestionably supports a finding of guilt on the greater offense since it was uncontradicted that the amount of cocaine exceeded twenty-eight grams. Additionally, the court’s instructions required the jury to consider guilt on the greater offense first. Having found guilt on the greater offense, it was of course unnecessary for them to proceed any further. Therefore, the verdict on the lesser offense is merely surplusage. Dixon [v. State, 437 N.E.2d 1318 (Ind.1982) ]; State v. Hill, 674 P.2d 96 (Utah 1983); see also People v. Albino, 104 A.D.2d 317 , 478 N.Y.S.2d 908 (App.Div.1984), affirmed, 65 N.Y.2d 843 , 493 N.Y.S.2d 305 , 482 N.E.2d 1221 (1985). Accordingly, the conviction for trafficking in cocaine is affirmed.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.