Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 490 So. 2d 322 - Magee v. Amiss

490 So. 2d 322 - Magee v. Amiss’s Empirical Analysis

1986

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
January 1988
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 15 U.S.C. § 1601 (§ 102 of the Truth in Lending Act)

Relies on Mennonite Board of Missions v. Adams · KIRCHBERG v. FEENSTRA Et Al. · Kirchberg v. Feenstra · Humphreys v. Royal · Judice-Henry-May Agency, Inc. v. Franklin

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The husband is the proper defendant in an action to enforce an obligation against the marital community. "When doubt exists whether the obligation sought to be enforced is that of the marital community or of the separate estate of the wife, the husband and wife may be sued in the alternative.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “The husband is the head and master of the partnership or community of gains; he administers its effects, disposes of the revenues which they produce, and may alienate them by an onerous title, without the consent and permission of his wife.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.