490 So. 2d 53 - Adams v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1986
Citation profile
25
cited by 25 later decisions
1
states following
February 1992
most recently cited
25 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 476 So. 2d 158 - Albritton v. State · 475 So. 2d 1356 - Boldes v. State · 458 So. 2d 320 - Albritton v. State · 477 So. 2d 663 - Riggins v. State · Adams v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“` twice been found to have violated the terms of her probation.'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“The fifth district has held that violating probation can be used to bump a sentence to the next single higher cell, but that further departure must be supported by another reason or reasons, Boldes v. State, 475 So.2d 1356 (Fla. 5th DCA 1985), and, also that multiple probation violations can support a departure of more than one cell. Riggins v. State, 477 So.2d 663 (Fla. 5th DCA 1985).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“by failing to file reports and keep in contact with her supervisor, by falsifying reports (among other things, she never reported her arrests on the other charges), and by failing to perform the required days of community service.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.