Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 490 So. 2d 80 - Lee v. State

490 So. 2d 80 - Lee v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1986

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
2
states following
May 2002
most recently cited

7 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently May 2002

7 state decisions

40198619902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Santobello v. New York · Williamson v. United States · 462 So. 2d 1082 - State v. Glosson · Deeb v. State · 342 So. 2d 818 - State v. Adams

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) The defendant reserves his right to appeal the denial of defendant's motion to dismiss for improper governmental conduct. (2) The State will recommend probation. (3) The State will remain silent as to the withholding of adjudication of guilt. (4) The state will enter a nolo prosequi to Counts II, III and IV of the information.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. 501 So. 2d 591 - Lee v. State
  2. “WHEN A LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICER MAKES AN INDEPENDENT RECOMMENDATION TO THE TRIAL COURT THAT RUNS COUNTER TO THE RECOMMENDATION IN A PLEA AGREEMENT ENTERED INTO BY THE STATE ATTORNEY'S OFFICE FOR THE "STATE," MUST THE TRIAL COURT PERMIT A WITHDRAWAL OF THE PLEA?”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. 501 So. 2d 591 - Lee v. State
  3. “a breach [of the plea agreement] occurs if any representative of the government fails to honor a plea bargain agreement entered into between the state and the defense, particularly if it influences a consequence not contemplated by the agreement.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
    e.g. 501 So. 2d 591 - Lee v. State

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.