Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 490 SO2D 913 - Knox v. Criddle

Knox v. Criddle’s Empirical Analysis

1986

Citation profile

1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
July 1988
most recently cited

1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 457 So. 2d 365 - Tidwell v. Strickler · 390 So. 2d 616 - Kerlin v. Tensaw Land & Timber Co., Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Upon remand, if the trial court is satisfied that the jury verdict is sufficiently complete, it should amend its judgment to carry out the statutory requisite for fixing the true boundary line. If, on the other hand, the trial court finds that the substance of the verdict will not support a judgment directing the sheriff to fix the true boundary line between the parties, as statutorily required, it should order a new trial.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.