Mortimer v. State

Christopher MORTIMER, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided February 18, 1986.

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1986-02-18

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently May 1988

8 state decisions

Relies on 478 So. 2d 1054 - State v. Jackson · 473 So. 2d 1324 - Reichman v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1986-02-18

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1 *94 Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender and Eric Wm. Hendon, Sp. Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

¶2Jim Smith, Atty. Gen. and Renee Ruska Pelzman and Nancy Wear, Asst. Attys. Gen., for appellee.

¶3Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and BARKDULL and JORGENSON, JJ.

¶4PER CURIAM.

¶5We hold that notations on a guidelines sentencing score sheet will not suffice as a written order stating reasons to enhance a sentence. State v. Jackson, 478 So.2d 1054 (Fla. 1985), Reichman v. State, 473 So.2d 1324 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985); Rule 3.701(d)(11) Fla.R.Crim.P. Therefore the sentence under review is reversed and the matter is returned to the trial court for resentencing.

¶6Reversed and remanded.