Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 490 SW2D 174 - Hicks v. State

Hicks v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1972

Citation profile

16
cited by 16 later decisions
1
states following
January 2019
most recently cited

16 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently January 2019

16 state decisions

7019721980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on California v. Green · Marable v. State · State v. Crawford · Hargrove v. State · Cooper v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In circumstantial evidence cases single facts of themselves may account each for little weight, but when all of the facts and circumstances are put together, they may unerringly point the finger of guilt to the defendant to the exclusion of all others beyond a reasonable doubt.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.