Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 490 SW2D 570 - Ex Parte Easley

Ex Parte Easley’s Empirical Analysis

1972

Citation profile

29
cited by 29 later decisions
2
states following
September 1994
most recently cited

29 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 29 later decisions — most recently September 1994 · most notably Thomas v. State (1981), Jurek v. State (1975)

29 state decisions

190197219801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Peyton v. Rowe · McNally v. Hill · Ex Parte Young · Rose v. State · Ex Parte Alegria

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 29 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““... an indictment may contain as many counts charging the same transaction as is thought necessary to meet the proof as it transpires and prevent a variance. ...””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.