Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 490 SW3D 571 - State v. Stukes

State v. Stukes’s Empirical Analysis

2016

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
October 2018
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Miller v. Fenton · Guzman v. State · State v. Moff · Haecker v. State · Earl v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “'If the issue involves the credibility of a witness, thereby making the evaluation of that witness' [sic] demeanor important, compelling reasons exist for giving the trial court discretion in applying the law to the facts.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “The amount of deference appellate courts afford a trial court's rulings depends upon which 'judicial actor' is better positioned to decide the issue.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.