In re Jefferson County’s Empirical Analysis
2013
Citation profile
1 district ·
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 105 · 11 U.S.C. § 362 · 11 U.S.C. § 541 · 11 U.S.C. § 902 · 11 U.S.C. § 922
Relies on Marrese v. American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons · Turner v. Rogers · Stern v. Marshall · A.H. Robins Co. v. Piccinin · Israel v. Wood Dolson Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) when an indemnification or contribution relationship creates an identity of interests between the debtor and the non-debtor defendant; (2) when the proceeding imposes a substantial burden of discovery on the debtor; or (3) when the proceeding would have a potential preclusive effect that forces the debtor to participate in the proceeding as if the debtor were a party”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“The protection of the automatic stay extends to any action or proceeding against an interest of the debtor. The scope of this protection is not determined solely by whom a party chose to name in the proceeding, but rather, by who is the party with a real interest in the litigation.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[T]he fact that the Assured Complaint does not actually name the County as a defendant is simply not controlling. . . . [T]he County has an indemnification agreement with JPMorgan that could make it responsible for any recovery Assured wins against JPMorgan.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.