Laundry, Dry Cleaning & Dye House Workers International Union, Local 93 v. Mahoney’s Empirical Analysis
491 F.2d 1029 · 1974
Citation profile
8 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently January 2023
8 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co. · United Steelworkers of America v. Enterprise Wheel and Car Corp · Textile Workers v. Lincoln Mills of Ala. · United Steelworkers v. American Manufacturing Co. · John Wiley & Sons, Inc. v. Livingston
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the agreement is intended to provide procedures for the equitable adjustment of all grievances and disputes arising between the Employer and the Union.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“unless it may be said with positive assurance that the arbitration clause is not susceptible of an interpretation that covers the asserted dispute. Doubts should be resolved in favor of coverage.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“I concur in Judge Heaney’s opinion on the issue of arbitrability, and in the result. ****** The point, it seems to me, is that in this case there is no “clear and unambiguous” evidence of nonarbitrability, and we are bound by the Steelworkers’ trilogy in such circumstances to hold the issue arbitrable, as Judge Heaney has well demonstrated. [Id. p. 1034 and 1035],”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.