United States v. Randall’s Empirical Analysis
491 F.2d 1317 · 1974
Citation profile
11
cited by 11 later decisions
May 1978
most recently cited
11 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291
Relies on Krulewitch v. United States · United States v. Peoni · Crawford v. United States · Carbo v. United States · Kirby v. Illinois
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“We are not unmindful of the difficult circumstances which place the defendant in a position where [he] finds [himself] defending against words [he] did not hear, at times unknown to [him], spoken by a person unavailable for cross-examination whose relationship to [him] is at best maintained by legal fictions. United States v. Randall, 491 F.2d 1317 , 1319 (9th Cir. 1974).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.