Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 491 F.2d 352 - Nelson v. Heyne

Nelson v. Heyne’s Empirical Analysis

491 F.2d 352 · 1974

Citation profile

117
cited by 117 later decisions
15
states following
October 2018
most recently cited

42 federal appellate · 6 district · 30 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 117 later decisions — most recently October 2018 · most notably Westlake v. Lucas (1976), Wyatt v. Aderholt (1974)

42 federal appellate · 6 district · 30 state decisions — followed in 15 states

48019741980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on In the Matter of Samuel Winship · Gault · Furman v. Georgia · Kent v. United States · Robinson v. State of California

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 117 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “`right to treatment' includes the right to minimum acceptable standards of care.”
    10 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “formal certification by a district judge is not always required in a marginally final case.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “We hold today only that the use of disciplinary beatings and tranquilizing drugs in the circumstances shown by this record violates plaintiffs’ 14th Amendment right protecting them from cruel and unusual punishment. We do not intend that penal and reform institutional physicians cannot prescribe necessary tranquilizing drugs in appropriate cases. Our concern is with actual and potential abuses under policies where juveniles are beaten with an instrument causing serious’injuries, and drugs are administered to juveniles intramuscularly by staff, without trying medication short of drugs and without adequate medical guidance and prescription.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.