United States v. Harding’s Empirical Analysis
491 F.2d 697 · 1974
Citation profile
13 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 17 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently January 2007
13 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1462 · 19 U.S.C. § 1305 (Tariff Act of 1930)
Relies on Miller v. California · United States v. Orito · United States v. Harding · United States v. One Reel of Film. Gerard Damiano Productions, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(r)elief can be granted from a stipulation in order to prevent manifest injustice.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[T]he new standards are less exacting to the prosecution. Thus, proof of obscenity is much less difficult under these standards. We believe that material found to be obscene under the Roth-Memoirs test would unquestionably satisfy the test contained in Miller.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.