¶1James G. Ellingburg, pro se.
¶2Jim Guy Tucker, Atty. Gen., Little Rock, Ark., for appellee.
¶3Before HEANEY and BRIGHT, Circuit Judges, and DENNEY, District Judge.*
¶6James G. Ellingburg appeals from the dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 petition. He alleged in the District Court that on October 26, 1973, the paramedic on duty at the Cummins Unit of the Arkansas Department of Corrections denied him “medication for [his] tubercular condition … ”.
¶7The District Court, after reviewing its “experience” with the appellant, found:
Petitioner has evidently had tuberculosis in the past, and his present condition calls for medication which is administered to him by paramedical personnel employed at Cummins, including respondent, Jerry Loyd. Petitioner is assigned to duty as a night janitor which is a light job assignment compatible with his physical condition and with his age.
… *
This time he complains that respondent, Loyd, unreasonably delayed fur*729nishing him with medication on October 26, 1973. The Court views the petition as frivolous … 1
¶8We agree with the trial court’s characterization of the petition and affirm its action.