Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 491 F.2d 753 - Banque de Depots v. National Bank of Detroit

Banque de Depots v. National Bank of Detroit’s Empirical Analysis

491 F.2d 753 · 1974

Citation profile

27
cited by 27 later decisions
1
states following
March 2010
most recently cited

10 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 27 later decisions — most recently March 2010 · most notably Lilley v. BTM Corp. (1992), Grover v. Eli Lilly & Co. (1994)

10 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions

10019741980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Foman v. Davis · Willard Dairy Corp. v. National Dairy Products Corp. · Willard Dairy Corp. v. National Dairy Products Corp. · Earl E. Komie v. Buehler Corporation, an Indiana Corporation, Buehler Corporation and James Bechtel · Joseph R. Armstrong, Sr. v. The Frostie Company, a New Jersey Corporation

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 27 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(a) Amendments. A party may amend his pleading once as a matter of course at any time before a responsive pleading is served or, if the pleading is one to which no responsive pleading is permitted and the action has not been placed upon the trial calendar, he may so amend it at any time within 20 days after it is served. Otherwise a party may amend his pleading only by leave of court or by written consent of the adverse party; and leave shall be freely given when justice so requires ....”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.