Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 491 F.2d 834 - C. F. Lytle Co. v. Clark

C. F. Lytle Co. v. Clark’s Empirical Analysis

491 F.2d 834 · 1974

Citation profile

31
cited by 31 later decisions
6
states following
March 2003
most recently cited

7 federal appellate · 10 district · 10 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 31 later decisions — most recently March 2003 · most notably Scott v. Greenville County (1983), Texas National Theatres, Inc. v. City of Albuquerque (1982)

7 federal appellate · 10 district · 10 state decisions

1501974198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Service Oil Co. v. Rhodus · Alexander v. Morrison-Knudsen Company · Crawford v. McLaughlin · Madis v. Higginson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 31 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““[wjhenever a non-conforming use has been discontinued for a period of one year, such use shall not thereafter be re-established, and any further use shall be in conformance with the provisions of this resolution or any amendment thereof.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““For there to be a taking the landowner must show he has been deprived of all reasonable uses of his land.” C. F. Lytle Co. v. Clark, 491 F.2d 834, 838 (10th Cir. 1974).”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[h]ad appellant [instead] continued construction it would have been permitted to complete the project, regardless of the change in the zoning laws.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.