491 F. Supp. 346 - Doe v. Sharp’s Empirical Analysis
1980
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 2 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently June 2009
2 federal appellate · 2 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1331 · 42 U.S.C. § 1302 (§ 1102 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 301 (§ 1 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 405 (§ 205 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 601 (§ 401 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 602 (§ 402 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 5 U.S.C. § 552A (§ 3 of the Privacy Act of 1974)
Relies on Lewis v. Martin · Shapiro v. Solman · 300 F. Supp. 409 - Solman Ex Rel. Gosman v. Shapiro · Shapiro v. Solman · 428 F. Supp. 896 - Stevens v. Berger
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Any Federal, State, or local government agency which requests an individual to disclose his social security account number shall inform that individual whether that disclosure is mandatory or voluntary, by what statutory or other authority such number is solicited, and what uses will be made of it.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Greidinger v. Davis
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.