Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 491 NE2D 976 - Hestand v. State

Hestand v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1986

Citation profile

21
cited by 21 later decisions
1
states following
December 2008
most recently cited

21 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 21 later decisions — most recently December 2008

21 state decisions

140198619902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Bose Corp. v. Consumers Union of United States, Inc. · Bieghler v. State · Johnson v. State · Lámar v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The guidelines for determining competency of counsel require deciding (1) whether counsel's performance was so deficient that he was not functioning as counsel as guaranteed by the Constitution, and if so, (2) whether this failure to function as counsel was so prejudicial as to deprive the defendant of a fair trial. Strickland v. Washington (1984), 466 U.S. 668, 687 , 104 S.Ct. 2052, 2064 , 80 L.Ed.2d 674, 692-693 , U.S. reh. denied (1984) 467 U.S. 1267 , 104 S.Ct. 3562 , 82 L.Ed.2d 864 ; Bieghler v. State (1985), Ind., 481 N.E.2d 78, 96 ; Elliott v. State (1984), Ind., 465 N.E.2d 707, 710 . Both poor performance and prejudice must be shown. Id. .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “the proper statutory language was then set forth as an explanation of the charge.... the body of ICG 34-42-4-3(c) was used.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.