State v. Ross’s Empirical Analysis
1992
Citation profile
7
cited by 7 later decisions
2
states following
March 2007
most recently cited
7 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on State v. Jones · State v. Norris · State v. Darveaux · Altobello v. Borden Confectionary Products, Inc. · Schmitz v. Stransky
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““In the ease of some crimes, such as perjury, deceit is an element of the crime; conviction of the crime therefore imports the use of deceit. In the ease of other crimes, deceit is not an element, but the manner in which the witness committed the offense may have involved deceit, and if that is shown the conviction is admissible under Rule 609(a)(2).””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Head“The difficulty in determining whether a particular crime falls under Minn.R.Evid. 609(a)(2) lies not in just the type of crime committed, but also in the manner in which the crime is carried out.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Head
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.