Finch v. Backes’s Empirical Analysis
1992
Citation profile
1 district · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently January 2015
1 district · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Tom Beuchler Construction, Inc. v. City of Williston · Muchow v. Lindblad · State v. Jager · Muhlhauser v. Becker
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“until our mandate was issued on August 12, 1988. We held that in dismissing on the ground that the statute of limitations had run,”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Jacobsen v. Haugen“the trial court erred in basing summary judgment of dismissal on the suit's supposed completion in 1987.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Jacobsen v. Haugen“only until after the suit [against Gillette and Kiefer Chevrolet] was completed, in 1987.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Jacobsen v. Haugen
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.