Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 491 NW2D 782 - State v. Casady

State v. Casady’s Empirical Analysis

1992

Citation profile

35
cited by 35 later decisions
3
states following
March 2019
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 34 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 35 later decisions — most recently March 2019 · most notably State v. Winter (1994), Waits v. United Fire & Casualty Co. (1997)

1 federal appellate · 34 state decisions

180199220002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · State v. Robinson · State v. Plaster · 76 Wis. 2d 72 - Sanford v. State · State v. Fetters

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 35 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A trial is a search for the truth. The rules of evidence are designed to further this search, and to that end the Legislature has expressly provided for the admissibility of other acts to show “... motive, opportunity, intent, preparation, plan, knowledge, identity, or absence of mistake or accident....” ... “No witness including a defendant who elects to testify in his own behalf is entitled to a false aura of veracity.” [The defendant] was not entitled to have the jury determine his guilt or innocence on a false presentation that his and the victim’s relationship and them parting were peaceful and friendly.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “the evidence offered would make the desired inference more probable than it would be without the evidence.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “The remoteness of evidence generally affects the weight rather than admissibility of the remote evidence.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.