491 So. 2d 1049 - Rice v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1986
Citation profile
10 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently February 2009
10 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Irvin v. Dowd · Dobbert v. Florida · United States v. Satterfield · United States v. Brown · United States v. Palma
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[I]t is clear that the Alabama legislature . . . intended that restitution be incorporated into the traditional sentencing procedure and that it be imposed as a criminal, not civil, penalty. 'Restitution is a permissible penalty imposed on the defendant as part of sentencing.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Jolly v. State“[O]ur legislature, ... did not intend to make restitution a civil action. Restitution is not subject to the requirements of a civil adjudication ...”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.