Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 491 So. 2d 1083 - Dumas v. State

491 So. 2d 1083 - Dumas v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1986

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
2
states following
September 1992
most recently cited

5 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Roan v. State · Watson v. State · Ex parte State ex rel. Attorney General · Consalvo v. State · 462 So. 2d 953 - Ex Parte Troha

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “" 'The test of vitiating influence is not that it did influence a member of the jury to act without the evidence, but that it might have unlawfully influenced that juror and others with whom he deliberated, and might have unlawfully influenced its verdict rendered.' "”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.