491 So. 2d 1258 - Dueitt v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1986
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
April 1999
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 438 So. 2d 8 - Robinson v. State · 478 So. 2d 403 - Snook v. State · 443 So. 2d 176 - Alfonso v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Here, neither the defendant nor his counsel promptly and timely brought the matter of possible juror misconduct to the attention of the trial court; rather, they waited until after the matter had been submitted to and decided by the jury. Defendant, having elected to trust this jury rather than timely raising the issue before additional time was consumed in the trial, will not be heard to raise the issue after conclusion of the trial and announcement of the verdict.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.