State v. Henderson’s Empirical Analysis
1986
Citation profile
11
cited by 11 later decisions
1
states following
January 1990
most recently cited
10 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1
Relies on Duncan v. State of Louisiana · Baldwin v. New York · Muniz v. Hoffman · United States v. Craner · State v. Seals
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"[T]he `special costs' assessed convicted DWI first offenders under La.Code Crim. Pro.Ann. art. 887(C) and (D) and the `reinstatement fee' required by La.Rev.Stat. Ann. 32:414(G) are simply costs, and not fines. Thus they should not be added to the authorized $500 fine under La.Rev. Stat.Ann. 14:98 so as to trigger La.Code Crim.Pro.Ann. art. 779(A)'s right to trial by jury where `punishment may be a fine in excess of $500.'"”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“in which the punishment may be confinement at hard labor or confinement without hard labor for more than six months.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Landry v. Hoepfner“in which the punishment is necessarily confinement at hard labor,”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Landry v. Hoepfner
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.