Sharp v. Sharp’s Empirical Analysis
1973
Citation profile
3 federal appellate · 13 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently May 2009
3 federal appellate · 13 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Colley v. Colley · Wacker v. Wacker · Sandusky v. Sandusky · Beggs v. Beggs · Reed v. Reed
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The plaintiff, Sarah R. Sharp, is further awarded by way of division of jointly acquired property, the sum of Seventy-four Thousand Fifty-five ($ 74,055.00) Dollars.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“The increase in value not attributable to `team effort' or `team funds' follows the property.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Travis v. Travis
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.