Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 491 SW2D 903 - Morgan v. State

Morgan v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1973

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
October 1984
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Childs v. State · Gonzales v. State · Allen v. State · 156 Tex. Crim. 301 - Saucier v. State · 161 Tex. Crim. 135 - Silba v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “It is always permissible to refresh the memory of a witness. Where he swears of his own knowledge he may refer to any thing or fact that he may choose in order to refresh his memory in regard to a matter about which he may be called on to testify. Memory may be refreshed by calling the witness’s attention to testimony previously given or to statements made by him, or by reference to records, memoranda, or other documents, or by propounding questions; and leading questions are permissible for this purpose.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.