Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

491 S.W.3d 265

Randolph v. Baldin

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided March 22, 2016

Missouri Court of Appeals · decided 2016-03-22

Decided 2016-03-22

¶1Order

Per Curiam:

¶2James Randolph appeals the trial court’s judgment in favor of the defendants, Christine and Anthony Baldin, in Randolph’s action for trespass and nuisance. The trial court determined that Randolph lacked standing to assert his claims because Randolph failed to show that he had legal possession or ownership of the property at issue. We affirm. Rule 84.16(b).

/491/sw3d/265 · .json · Public domain