Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 491 U.S. 22 - Dellmuth v. A Muth

Dellmuth v. A Muth’s Empirical Analysis

1989

Citation profile

544
cited by 544 later decisions
33
cited 33 times by the Supreme Court
6
states following
February 2023
most recently cited

153 federal appellate · 68 district · 11 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 544 later decisions (33 by the Supreme Court) — most recently February 2023 · most notably Will v. Michigan Department of State Police (1989), United States v. Lopez (1995)

153 federal appellate · 68 district · 11 state decisions

344019891990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 20 U.S.C. § 1400 (Education for All Handicapped Children Act of 1975) · 20 U.S.C. § 1411 · 20 U.S.C. § 1415 · 29 U.S.C. § 794 · 42 U.S.C. § 2000D

Relies on Edelman v. Jordan · Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. Halderman · Will v. Michigan Department of State Police · Board of Education of Hendrick Hudson Central School District Bd of Ed Westchester County v. Rowley · Rice v. Santa Fe Elevator Corp.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 544 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[E]vidence of congressional intent must be both unequivocal and textual.”
    17 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Congress may abrogate the States' constitutionally secured immunity from suit in federal court only by making its intention unmistakably clear in the language of the statute.”
    15 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “unmistakably clear in the language of the statute.”
    15 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.