Saal v. Mielke’s Empirical Analysis
492 F.2d 1184 · 1974
Citation profile
5 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Relationships
Relies on School Board of Richmond v. State Board of Education · Hackney v. Machado · Traylor v. Black, Sivalls & Bryson, Inc. · Cervantes v. Time, Inc. · The City National Bank Of Fort Smith, Arkansas v. Ilo Vanderboom
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“is an extreme remedy, one which is not to be entered unless the movant has established his right to a judgment with such clarity as to leave no room for controversy and that the other party is not entitled to recover under any discernable circumstances.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.